Since
the Town Council assumed the responsibility over Igartza there
were no other neighbours as venerable, honourable and famous as
this town.
Nevertheless,
over the generations the postures found have in fact been the
ones that have defined the relationship between Igartza and Beasain.
Indeed, these two towns have embodied and protected two completely
different visions of the world.
Whilst
the people of Beasain organized their lives around the local community
and the town council, in Igartza the daily routine was organized
around the Lord of the area, most specifically around only one
person.
For
this reason, if an identity was developed in the town that was
based on what belonged to a place, those who entered the network
of the Palace joined the figure of a leader, and not a territory.
In order to be from Beasain, the town, the town district and the
town leaders became necessary; on the other hand, to be from Igartza,
there were no frontiers: any place where a relative, customer
or servant of the Lord of Igartza was present was Igartzatarra
(from Igartza).
To
use a present day example, if the citizens of Beasain in those
days showed us "their ID car" Ordizia-Beasain would be their identifying
points, but those of Igartza, on the other hand, would be shown
by Oinatz-Lazkano-Igartza. The first ones are towns; and the second
are surnames.
These
two philosophies - local community relations/family relations
- were in dispute in order to achieve the adhesion of the inhabitants
of the district and receive their economic and human resources.
For this reason, we would have to place the developments of Igartza
and Beasain in the context of the confrontation between the villages
and the Elders. With the purpose of facing up to them, Segura
and Ordizia appeared, which were joined by those who did not want
to fall in the domain of the Elders, in this case in the domain
of the Lord of Lazkano, they lived in the old Mayoralty of Areria.
In this dynamic, Astigarreta and Gudugarreta joined Segura in
1384; Beasain, on the other hand, came under the protection of
the Villafranca of Ordizia in 1399.
As
a result of this situation, those that defended a society whose
key was a relationship based on hierarchical family relationships,
opted to give a new impulse to the Igartza that was created in
the Middle Ages.
The
buildings that we currently enjoy in Igartza are the heirs of
this decision. However, with the acceptance as a neighbour recently
granted to Beasain, the confrontations came to an end. Igartza,
nowadays, is just another neighbour, although its phenomenal aspect
strongly claims its past.

|
|
As
has already been stated, we can consider these elegant structures
as a result of the decision made at the end of the 14th century
by the faction of Lazkano to renovate them. Following the writers
of the time, and in order to face up to the challenge presented
by Segura-Ordizia-Beasain, Joan López de Lazkano chose one of
his children to support Igartza. Garci López de Lazkano was chosen,
entrusting him to increase the value of Igartza, both in terms
of rent and men.
Following
this objective, Garci López and his successors took over with
lands and attracted people to the place. Along with this, and
among other aspects, they put the mill and the ironworks into
operation.
Such
an enormous task came across large obstacles, mainly after 1456
and Enrique IV king of Castile's order to demolish all the tower-houses
and Igartza was unauthorised.
In
any case, the tendency marked by Garci must have gone ahead, since
it is clear that Igartza was operative in 1475. Therefore, in
the will of who would be Garci's granddaughter, María de Igartza,
dated in 1504, the following list of properties figures: Palace
of Igartza, mill and ironworks; ironworks of Igartzaola (in Aratz-Matxinbenta);
the Usategi, Zapatari and Errementari houses; Aratz country inn
and mill; Agirrezabal hospital; Barrendain country house, Antzizar
txikia, Abarizketa Behekoa and Arrieta.
We
will now look at the main characteristics of these buildings.
|